Mahmoud Darwish–A poet dies, but not his poetry. By Anjali Kamat

Magid Shihade August 16th, 2008

Op-Ed‘Record:

I am an Arab!’Anjali Kamat

Posted online: Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 0120 hrs  

Even in death, Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish was denied his dream of return

 

 Mahmoud Darwish, the incomparable poet of Palestinian experience, of exile, and of resistance, has slipped into the absence he so often invoked in his poetry. Darwish, who was born in the spring of 1942 in a Palestinian village that no longer exists, died last week in a hospital in Houston, Texas. He was sixty-seven years old, the poet laureate of the Palestinians, a towering figure in Arabic literature, and one of the greatest poets of the twentieth century. He had published over 30 volumes of poetry and prose, been translated into 35 languages, and received numerous awards including the 1969 Lotus Prize from the Union of Afro-Asian Writers, the 1983 Lenin Peace Prize, and the 2001 Lannan Foundation Prize for Cultural Freedom.

But Darwish’s unparalleled popularity in the Arab world extended far beyond literary circles. He enjoyed a rare iconic status that few poets since Pablo Neruda or Faiz Ahmad Faiz can claim. His public appearances drew excited crowds that could fill football stadiums, his writing caused heated debates in the Israeli Knesset, and his words have been immortalised as anthems of the Palestinian struggle by the immensely popular Lebanese musician Marcel Khalife.

Darwish’s own life played no small part in this strong identification between the poet and his homeland. He was born in Al-Birwa, a village in the Galilee, at a time when Palestine was under the British Mandate. The nakba or catastrophe of 1948 struck when he was barely seven years old, and Jewish militias destroyed Al-Birwa along with more than 400 other Palestinian villages. Darwish’s family fled to Lebanon. When they returned a year later to what used to be their home, their village no longer existed, and from the standpoint of the new state of Israel, neither did they. Darwish, like thousands of other Palestinians inside Israel, became an internal refugee living under a system of military rule and legally classified in terms only Orwell could match: a “present-absent alien.”

At twelve, the young writer was warned by a military governor of the dangers of subversive poetry when he recited a poem on the anniversary of Israel’s founding about Palestinian dispossession. But Darwish, afflicted with what he would later call “an incurable malady called hope,” never stopped writing, despite being jailed five times for his poetry. And as he wrote he became a voice for a people whose very existence was consistently denied, perhaps most famously by former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir who asserted that “there is no such thing as Palestinians.” One of his earliest published poems, “Identity Card,” begins with the declaration: “Record, I am an Arab!”

In 1971 as Darwish left the Galilee to study in Moscow, he was stripped of his citizenship by Israel. For the next quarter century he became the pre-eminent poet of exile, writing about resistance, memory, history, language, love, borders, homelands, and homelessness. He was only allowed to return to the West Bank in 1996, after the establishment of the Palestinian Authority. Until then Darwish was permanently on the move, living in and out of suitcases, airports, and hotel rooms in Beirut, Cairo, Amman, Tunis, Cyprus, and Paris. In Beirut Darwish wrote some of his most powerful verses about the Israeli siege of the city and massacres of Palestinians in Lebanon. Continuing his earlier political activism — he had been involved with the Israeli Communist Party and edited their newspaper — he joined the executive committee of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) in the early 1970s. His commitment to the Palestinian national struggle remained but his investment in organised politics did not last forever. Like his close friend Edward Said, Darwish also became deeply disillusioned with Yasser Arafat over the signing of the Oslo peace accords and resigned from the PLO in 1993.

Notwithstanding his close association with Palestinian history and experience, Darwish, like all great poets, does not belong to his people alone; the beauty of his art is universal. In his later years his writing expanded and engaged a variety of historical experiences, drawing from Greek mythology, Native American and Near Eastern history, and Qur’anic and Biblical references. But echoes of the Palestinian experience would remain. In his poem “The Speech of the Red Indian,” he wrote: “O you who are guests in this place, leave a few chairs empty/ for your hosts to read out / the conditions for peace / in a treaty with the dead.” Last year Darwish lamented: “How difficult it is to be Palestinian, and how difficult it is for a Palestinian to be a writer or a poet . . . How can he achieve literary freedom in such slavish conditions? And how can he preserve the literariness of literature in such brutal times?”

Indeed the times are brutal. Israel’s devastating blockade of Gaza continues, the daily humiliation and abuse of Palestinians at checkpoints shows no sign of abating, illegal Jewish-only settlements in the West Bank are expanding, and a just peace remains beyond reach. And even in death, Darwish was denied his dream of return. The Israeli authorities refused to allow him to be buried in his birthplace of Al-Birwa inside Israel. He was buried Wednesday in Ramallah after a state funeral attended by tens of thousands of mourners.

An exile since the age of seven, Darwish could only return to language and he found a home in poetry like few others have been able to. And his words will always remain, despite his absence, forever present, “beyond the last frontier / after the last sky.”  

The writer is an NYC-based producer for a daily radio and TV news show, Democracy Now! and the managing editor of Arab Studies Journal

http://indianexpress.com/story/348688.html  

Resistance and machinic phylum

Christopher Kullenberg August 15th, 2008

[this is a cross-post from panspectrocism.org]

This week I presented the panspec-project at the conference One or Several Deluzes in Cardiff. The slides are availible as flash or pdf. In the future I hope to publish the text online somewhere. Maybe, if there is an interest, I plan to make a special issue of the Resistance Studies Magazine about surveillance and resistance. If anybody is interested, please drop a line to christopher.kullenberg@theorysc.gu.se. Also, I will give a seminar on these matters in november with Dr. Karl Palmås.
However, the main argument can be summarised with this picture:

Panspectric technologies were initially developed with in signals intelligence. Now they are progressively being transferred to all aspects of every-day life, thus enforcing social order.

The notion of the panspectron was coined by Manuel DeLanda’s in his book War in the Age of Intelligent Machines (1991), referring mainly technological developments within signal intelligence during the second world war and onwards. According to DeLanda it differs from the panopticon in the nature of its gaze. The panopticist social diagram depended on the actual or potential human gaze employed to survey or induce a state of consciousness through the awareness of a possible surveyor. Warfare, according to Foucault, needed both discipline in order to function smoothly, as well as a bio-political State-apparatus to produce healthy soldiers ready to go to war. The model of the barrack was composed within a social diagram similar to that of the school and the prison, because it employed a system of surveillance, evaluation and discipline. This way, obedient subjectivities were produced necessary for the organisation of large-scale armies and their supporting activities. But the expressive assemblages of obedience, and their opposites - delinquency, depend on a certain content which, one might argue, is about to disappear.

The panspectron, thus, functions in another fashion according to DeLanda:

There are many differences between the Panopticon and the Panspectron /…/ Instead of positioning some human bodies around a central sensor, a multiplicity of sensors is deployed around all bodies: its antenna farms, spy satellites and cable-traffic intercepts feed into its computers all the information that can be gathered. This is then processed through a series of “filters” or key-word watch lists. The Panspectron does not merely select certain bodies and certain (visual) data about them. Rather, it compiles information about all at the same time, using computers to select the segments of data relevant to its surveillance tasks. (DeLanda 1991:XX)

Schools, barracks and prisons are becoming less all-encompassing as social institutions, even though it may be contested in the case of prisons. But I will argue, along with Deleuze (1991) that there has been an fundamental mutation, which may be followed through technological development and uses of technology. To map present day technologies of surveillance, concepts are desperately needed, and I propose to introduce the notions of phylum as a taxonomic marker of the ‘body plans’ of panspectric technologies. And in order to to trace their historical development, we need the a phylogenetic description of how technologies have emerged and evolved within our present day societies.

Also, I use this conceptual apparatus when dealing with Burma. Read more here.

CFP: RSMag 2008#4

Christopher Kullenberg August 14th, 2008

The Resistance Studies Magazine is calling for papers for issue 4/08 with a thematic focus on Chinese Resistance.

Guest Editors:

Wei Liu wie.liu(at)gmail.com and Jorgen Johansen johansen.jorgen(at)gmail.com

We will consider:

Theoretical and empirical articles on power, resistance and social change in Chinese history and ongoing actions and campaigns with a Chinese connection.

We have a special interest on the struggle in Tibet and the protest and counter-protests around the Olympic Games.

Articles on Internet, electronic resistance and struggle against censorship in China.

Reviews of scholarly articles and books.

Deadline for manuscripts: October 20.

For further information, please see our Submission guidelines on

Expected to be published in December 1.

Third semester of Resistance Seminars at Gothenburg University

Stellan Vinthagen August 12th, 2008

Dear friends at the Resistance Studies Network. The third semester of Resistance Studies Seminars are now ready! You can find the schedule below and updated information at the site above (See “Seminars”). The seminars - every second Thursday at 15-17 - are organised at the School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University and are regularly held in English (sometimes in Swedish). One week before the seminars (at least) a paper or background text is available at the site. The seminars are following a short network business-meeting (between 14-15 in the same room) in which we discuss the development and projects of our network. After the seminars we gather at restaurant Gyllene Prag across the street (from 17 and onwards…), where we drink and eat food, as well as discuss the seminar and resistance (or the latest movies, parties or relationship-gossips…).

You are welcome! Please feel free to forward the information to others!

Stellan Vinthagen, Seminar organiser RSN.

  1. Sep 11 2008 Peace Researcher Jörgen Johansen; Seminar on 9-11 and terrorism. “Osama Bin Laden should be thanked for the awakening!” The resistance is growing globally as a result of 9-11 and the ”War on Terror”. Which possible roads are probable, likely, wise and/or catastrophic? (see http://www.transnational.org/SAJT/tff/people/j_johansen.html)
  2. Sep 25 Visual Artist and former prof of Fine Arts Cecilia Parsberg; Seminar on Art, Culture and Resistance. About how art or our aesthetic expressions can be used as resistance, with examples from Sweden, Palestine and other places in the world. Film: “A Heart from Jenin”. Before the seminar, please read the paper (downloadable above at “Seminars”) and see previous projects at http://this.is/parsberg/)
  3. Oct 9 Seminar with Movies on Resistance (Stellan Vinthagen). One or several shorter movies on resistance relevant themes will be shown and discussed. If you have suggestions, contact Stellan; stellan. vinthagen @ resistancestudies. org (type without spaces in the address)
  4. Oct 23 Riff-Raff Co-Editor Per Ström; Seminarium om klasskamp och det “ansiktslösa motståndet” (Seminar is in Swedish, and about hidden work-place resistance). Per inleder diskussionen utifrån sin specialskrivna artikel för seminariet; ”Den politiska ekonomins väktare och desertörer: kapital, vänstern och det ansiktslösa motståndet.” Statistiken visar att fackligt motstånd och arbetarplatskamp minskat på senare decennier men stämmer det med verkligheten? Kan det vara så att kampen ändrat form under kapitalismens förändring och nya villkor? (Per is part of the editing team of http://www.riff-raff.se/)
  5. Nov 6 Dr Karl Palmås and Resistance Magazine Editor Christopher Kullenberg; Seminar on Surveillance, Power and Resistance. In late-modern societies in the West, as well as dictatorships, like Burma or China, surveillance is increasing and is developed into new forms. That changes the power structure, but also the articulation and expressions of resistance. Palmås and Kullenberg talks from their ongoing “Panspec-project”. (See http://rsmag.org/ and http://www.isk-gbg.org/99our68/)
  6. Nov 20 Assistant Prof. Bengt Brülde; Seminar on the Ethical Obligation to Resist. In some situations resistance is arguably an ethical obligation. (See http://maya.phil.gu.se/bengt/)
  7. Dec 4 PhD-Student Gunilla Priebe; Seminar on Resistance within the Science Discourse. Priebe talks about “Who is the expert? Re-defining scientific quality standards as a source of resistance towards colonially ascribed identities”. The theme is drawn from ongoing research (PhD project, dissertation June 2009). (See http://hum.gu.se/institutioner/idehistoria-och-vetenskapsteori/vetenskapsteori/utbildning/forskarutbildning/doktorander/gunilla/view?searchterm=approach)
  8. Dec 18 Post-Doc Fellow Patricia Lorenzoni; Seminar on Quilombo – stories about resistance and the right to land in Brazil. The seminar discusses histories of resistance and the right to land from the Case of Maroon descendants in Brazil. Quilombos were settlements of runaway slaves (Maroon) and other marginalised people in colonial Brazil that started in the 16th century. Although many quilombos were violently crushed, other survived at the margins of colonial society and are now negotiating their right to land. Lorenzoni’s dissertation dealt with violence, civilisation processes and anthropological understanding of the “savage”. (See http://hum.gu.se/institutioner/idehistoria-och-vetenskapsteori/personal/andra/patricia)

RSMag 2008#3 out now!

Christopher Kullenberg August 8th, 2008

[this message may be re-published anywhere]   - The third issue of the Resistance Studies Magazine is out now. You may read it immediately following this link. It has been a great pleasure to edit the five articles, and they are really worth reading. Here is a short summary of the articles from the editorial column: 

  • Drawing on a theoretical combination of James Scott’s conception of everyday resistance and Erwin Goffman’s symbolic interactionism, Carol Jo Evans develops an interesting case study of resistance within a North American Appalachian community.
  • Shane Gunderson discusses how resistance movements may gain momentum, as “popular intellectuals” facilitate and combine ideological work with political initiative. Gunderson shows, through a case-study, that structuring resistance in a more strategic fashion, through sequential actions, will increase the possibility of social change. 
  • Femke Kaulingfreks writes about the May 2008 riots in Copenhagen, and how such events, when taken seriously, seem to grow politics from the middle, thus shaping grounds for important political agency. What falls outside of normalisation, is not necessary disruptive in a counter-productive way, but may reveal inequalities and open up debates.
  • Thomas Riegler analyses the film The Battle of Algiers and how it has been caught up in debates on whether it has influenced resistance like an instruction manual in asymmetric warfare and guerrilla tactics, or not.
  • Finally, Adrian Bua deals with the problems of pluralism and democracy, and proposes how class analysis can contribute to a more sustainable alternative called pluralist socialism. 

Please download and read the articles, and watch out for a CFP for the 2008#4 Special Issue. 

Boycott the Olympic Games!

Stellan Vinthagen August 7th, 2008

The official start of the Olympic Games in Beijing are on Friday the 8th of August with the opening cermony. And the games goes on until the 24th of Aug - with thousands of participating athlets, thousands of journalists and VIP-people, and; billions of TV-viewers.

Despite the dictatorship of China and its regular surpression of oppositional movements (not limited to the student democratic movement, Tibet, Falung Gong, but also several ethnic minorities), despite its support for the dictatorship in Burma (including arms export and blockade of a UN-arms embargo), despite its non-conditional investments and arms export to African dictatorships (a region US imperialism has ignored for a long time).

But now there exists possibilities for us ordinary people to boycott the Olympic Games, not by our non-participation as athlet (despite our possibilities to break new world reccords…) but also by making our refusal to watch the TV-shows from the games! A Facebook campaign has started which tries to gather one million boycotting non-TV-viewers. Join the campaign and make your refusal to be entertained by the propaganda of China. Break the myth of a “non-political” Olympic Games!

The boycott of the TV-OG is connected to a support of Burma and consist of two specific demands of China:

1) Stops blocking a United Nations arms embargo on Burma and stops selling weapons to Burma’s regime, and

2) Ends its support for Burma’s regime.

If China does not change its policies, you will:

- Not watch the Beijing Olympics, especially the opening and closing ceremonies.
- Not purchase Olympics souvenirs and merchandise
- During the Olympics you will not purchase goods from Olympic corporate sponsors.

Join “Pledge& Join One Million People NOT Watching the Beijing Olympics For Burma” at  http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=13804897308

If you are not on Facebook go to: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1189/t/5102/signUp.jsp?key=3127

China’s Olympic Games’ Official Site Hacked

Stellan Vinthagen August 7th, 2008

On Wednesday TheColorOrange.net received an anonymous telephone call that hackers have changed the headlines of the official Chinese Olympic website into orange, the signal color of the human rights abuses in China.

In this connection the initiator of TheColorOrange campaign, Danish artist Jens Galschiot, declares:

“In fact I was rather sceptical about the message, but I’ve checked the website at stated that actually the headlines are orange. But I dare not say whether hackers or a humanitarian minded web designer are the originators.

If hackers critical to China have changed the color, we have to do with a highly sophisticated action, that will make a fool of China all over he world. It will also boost the focus on the use of Orange as a cunning way of criticising China during the OG in Beijing. Anyway we are not unequivocally enthusiastic about the support as we do not defend unlawful hacking of websites. In this case, however, we have to do wit a rather harmless hacking supportive of the human rights. These hackers must be exceptionally skilful if they have managed to make this small but very powerful change of the official OG websites.

We hold no sway whatsoever over the development of TheColorOrange project. The idea has spread on the Web like wildfire. Our homepage has had about 250,000 visitors and thousands will hang up orange cloth strips in their cities or wear something orange.

We expect that also in China many will use orange as a signal color. Athletes, politicians, journalists and others will display something orange during the games. Doing so, they will send a signal that something is going wrong in China. It may be an orange hat, camera bag, tie, pen, paper, dress, suit, bag etc. Even pealing an orange may be considered a poignant statement. In most cases the motive cannot be uttered, as neither the OIC nor the Chinese authorities will tolerate display of any symbols expressing criticism of China. The Orange supporters will have to say, with a wry smile, that they are fond of orange. The use of orange is the artifice that will allow everybody to participate in the Olympics and at the same time express their disapproval of the human rights violations in the country.”

For more info see http://www.thecolororange.net

The Olympic Games Official Site: http://en.beijing2008.cn/

 

Site created that helps resistance against Surveillance in Sweden

Stellan Vinthagen August 6th, 2008

During the last months the new surveillance law (the FRA-law) in Sweden has been videly debated. The law makes mass-surveillance of mail-traffic, sms, phones, etc. possible of Swedes without suspicions of illegal activity. Internet company CEOs, conservative party officials, liberal newspapers, etc. have together with the normal oppositional crowd of anarchists, communists, liberal free-thinkers, hippies and hackers protested in many different forms. Now, after the law was adopted by the parliament, some MPs try to scrap it afterwards, despite voting for it when it was adopted…Others are mobilising the resistance to the new reality of surveillance of our digital-communication. A new site is helping people to use a standard text within their emials that will make FRA’s computorised search programmes to react. The standard text (which can be randomly developed at the site to create variation) contains a message saying things like: “Dear FRA, I have nothing to do with Al Qaida, and I don’t plan to plant any bombs, and am against terrorist attacks of all sorts…”.

“Hej FRA!
Det finns ingen anledning att läsa mitt mail. Jag har ingenting att göra med ETA, al-Jama’a al-Islamiyya eller Hamas. Jag har aldrig gjort Shahada eller tillverkat biologiska vapen, jag vet knappt ens vad Faqih betyder. Men tack för visat intresse!

PS. Terroristattacker kommer knappast att planeras över okrypterade mail. Sabba FRA-lagen på www.hejfra.se”

Since the search programmes of FRA look for certain key words (like “bombs”, “terrorism”, “Al Qaida”) the mail will be read by someone. The goal is to overburden the surveillance system by making too many mails necessary to read, thus raising the costs of the surveillance. We will have to wait and see if this will be effective, something that will depend on how many people that will use the site and its “polite resistance”. Check it out for yourself (only in Swedish) on www.hefFRA.se

Resistance in striated space

Christopher Kullenberg July 25th, 2008

Chinese authorities have set up special zones for protests during the olympics, which may take place two weeks before the inauguration of the games.

This, however, is not a typically Chinese strategy. During the olympic games in Athens and Salt Lake City, protests were limited.

With more than 253 million Internet users, and only 50 being imprisonated (which of course is 50 too many), there is a fundamental opposition between controlled surfaces, and the possibility of coordinated action. This tension is of course highly relevant to resistance studies.

The next number of the Resistance Studies Magazine will be a special issue on Chinese resistance and the Olympics. Watch out for a CFP in the near future!

Politics in everyday life

Safaa July 18th, 2008

I am now writing on a thesis about everyday politics and would like to continue on a thread written by Stellan Vinthagen in this blog the 5th of June.

The aim of the thesis is to outline different forms of everyday political acts. In studying organisations that deal with politics in everyday life I will try to see what, how and when individualised politics occur in Sweden. I can already now see that some organisations are dealing with hidden resistance, as the one Stellan wrote about, and others with more open acts that not necessarily could be called resistance.

In order to continue the categorisation I need to define what resistance is and what is not when comparing stealing from workplace, or foot-dragging, with buying fair trade or organic products. There are differences between the acts that need to be taken into consideration. They are close to categorisations such as “closer within system” or “more outside the system” (or the fields “encouraging” or “delaying” the system) or “within” or “outside norm”.

I agree with Stellan that it is highly interesting whether these informal, individual acts could be the start for uprisings. However, I was initially interested in this subject when thinking whether these individual acts could in themselves form a collective act, or even mobilisation. Though they seem to occur separately and unorganised I think that they could be collective as well. If anything, the individual acts are, according to me, organised within a discourse, especially the one of sustainable development. It dictates the time and place, and how to act.

And the question of mobilisation; could it be, that through politicising the everyday life, there is a stronger probability that people mobilise easily? If organisations give the space and forum for it, could they create another form of mobilisation of an “underground” or “quiet” uprising performed by individuals separately and anonymously? Examples of organisations are Planka.nu that encourages people to fair-dodge on public transport in protest of the capitalisation of public transport and Maska.nu that encourages, for example, foot-dragging to slow down production. They seem to organise and mobilise people, even though it is anonymously.

Also, what role could political acts performed in the everyday mean for the bigger picture? Even though the quantity of consumers boycott may not be enough to, for example, change a multi-national corporation like McDonalds, I believe that politicising food consumption at least gives a preparation for the time when the company simply can no longer continue as it does today (as the question is not if we have to change our consumption and production, rather when and how). So for example, if there is a common agreement, or discourse, that the meat industry is lethal for our planet and survival, then it could be easier to put governmental restrictions on that industry, as people will be prepared to live (nearly) without it, even though they used to consume from it. Vegetarians and vegans could be examples of individuals that are prepared for a food culture that probably most people have to live in, in the near future.

Reminder - Five days until CFP dead line

Christopher Kullenberg July 5th, 2008

There are still five more days to submit articles to the summer issue of the Resistance Studies Magazine (2008#3). Remember that we also, accept shorter reviews of books, articles and films, along our main focus on journal articles.

The fourth issue will be a special issue on resistance in China in the context of the Olympic games. Thus, this is the last opportunity for general topics during 2008.

For submissions, check out the guidelines, or if you wish to discuss your piece in beforehand, do not hesitate to contact the editors via e-mail.

Good luck with your manuscripts!

/Christopher Kulleberg

Google encouraged to resist Court order

jj July 4th, 2008

A federal judge in New York has ordered Google to turn over to Viacom a database linking users of YouTube, the Web’s largest video site by far, with every clip they have watched there.

Eric Schonfeld writes on TechCrunch that if Google doesn’t appeal or refuse the order to hand over data on YouTube users to Viacom they should apply in such a way that the receivers may regret: Print out the 12 Terrabytes they asked for. The court did not specify in what FORM the data should be delivered. That would be an amount of paper that is equal to some of the world largest libraries.

Does any of you have other examples where orders have been obeyed in similar ways; that is to make the fulfilment a nightmare for those who gave the order?

I would be interested in other examples for a coming article.

Shooting Back

klang July 2nd, 2008

Providing cameras and video cameras to different groups is not an uncommon method which allows the subjects to bring their own lives into focus without the direct mediation of the “outsider” camera/filmmaker. Naturally all uses of technology contain risks of bias and slanted views - nobody still believes that the camera never lies? Even if many still believe that fashion images are “real”.

In January 2007, B’Tselem launched Shooting Back, a video advocacy project focusing on the Occupied Territories. We provide Palestinians living in high-conflict areas with video cameras, with the goal of bringing the reality of their lives under occupation to the attention of the Israeli and international public, exposing and seeking redress for violations of human rights.

In projects such as these technology in the form of the cameras and Internet as a distribution medium can be used to empower those involved in a conflict while still providing a preaceful alternative way of coping with everyday violence.

NAFTA- resistance

jj June 23rd, 2008

An excellent presentation of NAFTA and the resistance to it by Janet M Eaton, PhD, academic, researcher, activist and free trade critic:

http://www.stopthehogs.com/pdf/nafta-resistance.pdf

Full text and more info on the agreement: http://www.sice.oas.org/trade/nafta/naftatce.asp

Call for papers - Resistance Studies Magazine 2008 03

Christopher Kullenberg June 11th, 2008

[please re-publish this message widely]

The Resistance Studies Magazine is calling for papers to the next general issue, expected to be published in mid August.

We will consider:

- Theoretical and empirical articles on power, resistance and social change.

- Reviews of scholarly articles and books.

On publication of the third issue, we will also officially launch our new website rsmag.org. This way we will be able to further develop the interactivity as well as the impact of the magazine.

Deadline for manuscripts: July 10. 

For further information, please see our Submission guidelines.

RSM added to the directory of Swedish journals for culture and arts

Christopher Kullenberg June 8th, 2008

We are happy to be added to the Swedish directory of journals for culture and arts (see our page here). Even though we publish in English only, we managed to get on the directory.

We encourage all readers to look for other directories and sites to spread the word of the magazine. It is totally open access, so the potential is unlimited when it comes to readership. If anybody knows of a place where we should be, please send an e-mail to christopher.kullenberg@theorysc.gu.se.

Soon the RSM will also launch a site of its own in order to provide possibilities for feedback and better publication formats. After an excellent editorial meeting in London, we are convinced that articles in resistance studies have a great potential within and outside academia.

Foucault & resistance

Per Herngren June 7th, 2008

“Foucault denied two crucial commonplaces of political thought: one, that there was a singular locus of power that could be contested and countered by those who were subject to specific rules of power, and two, that there were specific singular principles that organize such resistance. In his view, acts of resistance generally were not singular instances of binary oppositions or antinomies, but rather were multiple, mobile and transitory.”

“Thus, for Foucault, ‘when one defines the exercise of power as a mode of action upon the actions of others’ (i.e. as government in the broadest sense) then one must of necessity include resistance as an exercise of freedom (Foucault, 1982: 790; 000d: 292). Thus . . . power is exercised only over free subjects, and only insofar as they are free. By this we mean individuals or collective subjects who are faced with a field of possibilities in which several ways of behaving, several reactions and diverse comportments, may be realized.

. . . [A]t the very heart of the power relationship, and constantly rovoking it, are the recalcitrance of the will and the intransigence of freedom. (Foucault, 1982: 790)”

“While power relations are determined within the diagram, understood as a non-unifying immanent cause, resistance arises from the fold in the outside of thought. Here the resonance with Spinoza is too strong to ignore. In rejecting transcendental concepts of reason, sovereign power and transitive causality in favour of constitutive power and immanent causality Spinoza foreshadowed a mode of political engagement that was brought to fruition by Deleuze and Foucault.”

Source

James Juniper and Jim Jose, “Foucault and Spinoza: philosophies of immanence and the decentred political subject”, History of the Human Sciences 2008, 21, 1.

Foucauldian Reflections

Protect Academic Freedom: Download Al Qaida Training Manual

Stellan Vinthagen May 31st, 2008

Dear network members and all interested in academic freedom: Last week one researcher and one student were arrested at Nottingham University and kept for six days while their families, colleges and friends were interrogated. Their crime? They downloaded Al Qaida information, e.g. the Training Manual, from public websites, and, yes, as part of their studies of terrorism. After being reported they got arrested and now one of them are facing the risk of deportation, despite none of them are being charged…

This is one among several major threats to academic freedom, especially for us who are interested to study resistance. In solidarity with our fellow academics we need to act. One idea that is being spread through various academic networks, e.g. the British based Critical Terrorism Studies, is to make a massive download of, yes you guessed it: the Al Qaida Training Manual, and, guess from where it is downloadable? The US Department of Justice….:

You find it here: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/terrorism/alqaida_manual/

Academics at University of Nottingham did a protest gathering in which they read out the content of the downloaded material earlier this week.

For more information on this attack on academic freedom, see http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,,2282045,00.html

When do Individual Everyday Resistance Turn into Public Organized Resistance?

Stellan Vinthagen May 29th, 2008

During the International Studies Association (ISA) conference in New York City, February 2009, there will be two panels organized by the Resistance Studies Network: one on individual everyday resistance, one on organized collective resistance (with social movements, etc). These two panels represents the current division within resistance studies, one is focusing on discourses, the micro-physics of power relations, non-articulated resistance which goes on, sometimes unnoticed in the ordinary life of people. The other direction is focusing on resistance organizations, revolutions, social movements, and dramatic resistance actions. This division has historical roots. Early resistance research did only see the public, collective and organized (and violent) forms of resistance. Not until the ground breaking work of James Scott (1985, Weapons of the Weak) did resistance researchers observe the importance of hidden, everyday and individualized forms of resistance.

I think one of the key research areas today is to investigate the dynamics, mechanisms, techniques and contexts in which everyday forms of resistance transforms into collective organized resistance. Sometimes open rebellion erupts, revolutions develop in contexts where no signs did exist. In subaltern groups living under similar conditions you find that some groups do public resistance, others not.

So, when do the one turn into the other? What are the necessary conditions? What do resisters need to do in order to turn everyday resistance into open rebellion?

One possibility is that what you need is a strong resistance culture, a well developed culture of symbols and stories, a “fertile ground” in which more public forms could grow. But I am sure the answer is a lot more complicated than that. Hopefully we will see more students in the future focusing on this key problem.

People’s Tribunals as Constructive Resistance

Stellan Vinthagen May 23rd, 2008

At the last Gothenburg Resistance Seminar yesterday we discussed the law as expression of power and of resistance. Based on a (Swedish) paper from Dr Mikael Baaz (senior lecturer in international relations and legal studies) we tried to look on possibilities for law strategies for social movements, based on an understanding of the law as a social construction. One of the key conclusions were the need for alliances between legal experts/lawyers and activists. Another conclusion was that different societies/communities could compete over legal principles/systems. The sovereign nation state and its legal system is always challenged and not as sovereign as it claims.

I have since some time been thinking that the interesting phenonmenon of “People’s Tribunals” are under-researched as a form of resistance. It represents a broad alliance of law-experts/lawyers/judges, activists and communities affected by oppression. And, it is an attempt of undermining the monopoloy of law by states.

During September 2007 a critical movement organized People’s Tribunal against the World Bank was conducted at a university in New Delhi (JNU); the Independent People’s Tribunal on the World Bank in India. Various organisations, experts, intellectuals, researchers and victims presented their witness and evidence in which the bank was accused of conducting crimes against people with its anti-human and anti-development policies and projects. The jury found in their judgement the World Bank and Indian government guilty on several accounts.

The first such political but evidence-oriented movement organised tribunal I know of was the Russell Tribunal 1966-1967 against the US war in Vietnam in which among others the peace activist and philospher Bertrand Russel and intellectual Jean Paul Sartre took part. Recently we have also seen such tribunals against the US occupation of Iraq.

The problem with such tribunals are of course that they easily tend to be ignored, especially if their demands of evidence are low and if they tend to become mere political theater.

Still, in some cases they serve as the pre-hearing within civil society in preparation for making conventional law-suites, as with the recent “ethical tribunal” against 20 European corporations in Peru within the People’s Summit. The tribunal has over its 30 years of existence conducted 36 sessions.

Is these kind of people and movement organised tribunals possible to understand as resistance? When the state authorities (prosecutors, judges, etc.) are not taking accusations from affected people serious, these peoples are conducting the trials themselves. By refusing to accept a monopoloy of initiative and authority to judge right from wrong, to make normative statements based on thorough investigation - these groups could be said to do “resistance”.

We have earlier seen how movements protest against the laws which parliaments make, or the judgements courts give, and even movements trying to, sometimes succeeding to, create new laws in collaboration with willing law-makers/states when proper laws are lacking (e.g. the successful campaign for an international law against anti-personal mines), and most commonly, movements breaking the laws they don’t find legitimate (e.g. the Civil Rights Movement with M L King in the US). All these forms of resistance is much discussed, but , as far as I can see, not so much the people tribunals. With the tribunals we have a case of movements making the judgements themselves, challening the silence and (status que supportive) passivity of contemporary courts. As resistance it can be understood as pro-active and constructive; creating the better system while undermining the domination by existing systems.

Since the new International Criminal Court is a result from temporary ad-hoc tribunals (most famously the Nürnberg Trials but also the special tribunals in ex-Jugoslavia, Rwanda, etc.) it might not be impossible that also civil society organised “tribunals” result in new judicial praxis.

But such progressive effects of people’s tribunals are only possible, I think, if we talk about tribunals made in opposition to a dominant judicial system, not if it is made into a part of that dominant system, as in China during the Cultural Revolution…Then, the tribunals are not articulations of emerging new law and principles of justice but articulations of harrasment, oppression and violence.

If anyone has recommendations, thoughts or references to share on this topic I would be thankful.

Cathedrals and Bazaars

Christopher Kullenberg May 16th, 2008

Karl Palmås has released a short video on two modes of social organisation called A Robot Historian Ponders the Cathedral and the Bazaar, which is currently being displayed on the Museum of World Cultures in Gothenburg.

Accordingly, the cathedral mode of organisation is hierarchical and is inspired by military chains of command, whereas the bazaar follows a decentralised and autonomous mode of social production. The cathedral model has been dominant within western capitalism, and permeats corporations, States as well as some forms of resistance. The bazaar model, however, is according to Palmås, more democratic and productive, and he also argues in the first issue of the Resistance Studies Magazine, that the conceptual model of the computer has inspired and actualised this mode in contemporary activism.

The different modes of social organisation is crucial to Resistance Studies, and I personally hope to see more articles in coming issues of the RSM dealing with this question.

RSM qualified for the Directory of Open Access Journals

Christopher Kullenberg May 12th, 2008

The Resistance Studies Magazine has qualified for becoming a member of the Directory of Open Access Journals. (Click here to go to our entry).

To be included there are both epistemic criteria as well as demands on openness. The journal must be peer-reviewed and needs to have an active editorial function, and the articles must always be downloadable free of charge, allowing readers to redistribute, copy and print all content.

To me, stressing opennes (read the editorial in the second issue) is also related to making better studies and proper science. Our knowledge on resistance must always be available for people to object to, and to further develop, both in theory and practice.

I call out to academics worldwide, to consider the possibility of actively choosing open access journals, when possible, to support this effort in making knowledge accessible to as many as possible - in order to use it, resist it, and to challenge old models with new ones!

Hizbollah change strategy in Lebanon

jj May 11th, 2008

Hizbollah withdraws from Beirut easing crisis, but promise to continue with civil disobedience.

Hizbollah is withdrawing from Beirut after the army overturned government measures that sparked a revolt by the Syrian-backed Shi’ite movement. The group had been in control of Muslim west Beirut after driving out pro-government militias in a battle lasting several days. It was the worst internal fighting in the capital since the 1975-1990 civil war.

The pullout came after the army said the head of security at Beirut airport could keep his job and that military commanders would handle Hizbollah’s communications network. These were the two issues underlying the violence. Hizbollah has their own communication Network and camera surveillence in part of the city. One reason for the government to shut down the net was that Hizbollah had cameras on the road to the airport and could hence see and identify people arriving to and leaving from the airport.

The crisis has highlighted the weakness of of Prime Minister Fouad Sinioura anti-Syria cabinet. Before allowing the army to broker an end to the stand-off he had accused Hizbollah of staging a coup and trying to re-assert Damascus’s influence over the country. In his first response to Hezbollah’s de facto takeover of the west of the capital, Mr Siniora said his government would never declare war against the Shia group.

The fighting that claimed at least 27 lives spread beyond Beirut, reigniting sectarian tensions in several areas. The street battles may have ended but Hizbollah has promised to continue a campaign of civil disobedience against the government until all its political demands are met.

Sources: BBC, EuroNews and Chinaview

US labor movement against the war in Iraq

Christopher Kullenberg May 3rd, 2008

Strikes. The International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) announced that it would shut down West Coast ports on May 1, demanding complete withdrawal from Iraq. This is, according to the ILWU, the first time an American union has decided to undertake industrial action against a U.S. war, and they call for other unions to join their protest.

On May 1, some 25 000 dockworkers stayed home and all 29 ports up and down the coast were closed until the evening shift. However, no corporate media covered this event, except a local San Francisco TV-station (click to go to Youtube).

See also

Indybay

US Labor against the War in Iraq

Congratulation with 75 years of Resistance.

jj May 3rd, 2008

Catholic Worker
Founded by Dorothy Day and Peter Maurin on May Day 1933, during the height of the Great Depression, the Catholic Worker began as a radical newspaper and grew into a wider movement of hospitality and social activism. It now includes nearly 200 communities in the United States and eight other countries. The Catholic Worker movement have continued to resist consumerism, violence of all sorts, injustices, and discrimination. They have even resisted to go online with their magazine the Catholic Worker.

It remains committed to a “firm belief in the God-given dignity of every human person” and to the ideals of “nonviolence, voluntary poverty (and) prayer,” protesting “injustice, war, racism and violence of all forms.”

Day was a one-time radical Greenwich Village bohemian who underwent a conversion experience and became renowned as a Catholic writer and social activist.

Another constant for those involved in the Catholic Worker Movement is its cornerstone newspaper, the Catholic Worker, which still remains a penny a copy (excluding mailing costs).

If you want to study the movement and their activities you will find archives here and more information on the ongoing activities here.

Resistance Studies Magazine issue 2008#2 is here!

Christopher Kullenberg May 1st, 2008

*** This message may be republished anywhere ***

The second issue of the Resistance Studies Magazine is out now (Direct link to pdf). It contains five highly relevant articles discussing and defining what Resistance Studies is all about and one review contributing to the critical debate on the concept of resistance. The magazine has doubled in length since the first issue came out in January, and through online publication this of course renders no problems.
The titles and authors are:

  • Claims to Globalization: Thailand’s Assembly of the Poor and the Multilevel Resistance o Capitalist Development, by Pei Palmgren, New York University
  • Becoming Power Through Dance, by Duygun Erim, The Open University
  • Changing the system from the outside – an evaluative analysis of social movements opposing the 2007 G8 summit, by Patrick T. Hiller, Nova Southeastern University
  • Multinational Corporations and Human Rights Abuses: A case study of the Movement for the Survival of Ogoni People and Ijaw Youth Council of Nigeria, by Victor Ojakorotu (Monash University) and Ayo Whetho ( University of KwaZulu-Natal)
  • School’s Out: strategies of resistance in colonial Sierra Leone, by Christine H. Whyte, London School of Economics
  • Review; “Conceptualizing Resistance”, by Jocelyn A. Hollander and Rachel L. Einwohner, by Johan Johansson, University of Gothenburg, Museion

Please spread the word, and if you run a website or a blog, you are welcome to link to the magazine page!

Also the second issue has been produced with a zero budget, relying solely on the work of dedicated researchers and intellectuals. All of you who have contributed, even with the smallest things; Thank you so much!

Christopher Kullenberg (editor and publisher)

Jakob Lehne (assistant editor)

Ploughshares disarmament in New Zealand

Per Herngren April 30th, 2008

WAIHOPAI ANZAC PLOUGHSHARES

Waihopai Spy Base Penetrated

“The morning, 30 April 2008, we entered the Waihopai Spy Base near Blenheim.

Our group, including a Dominican Priest, temporarily closed the base by padlocking the gates and proceeded to deflate one of the large domes covering two satellite dishes.

At 6am we cut through three security fences surrounding the domes - these are armed with razor wire, infrared motion sensors and a high voltage electrified fence. Once inside we used sickles to cut one of the two 30-metre white domes, built a shrine and knelt in prayer to remember the people killed by United States military activity.

We have financed our disarmament through personal savings, additional part-time employment and a small interest-free loan from one of our supporters.

Sam, Peter and Adi have been denied bail and will remain in custody. The next hearing at Blenheim District Court.

There have been over 100 Ploughshares actions over the last twenty years around the world. Ploughshares direct actions are linked through the common factors of: entry to locations connected to military activity, and involve some form of property destruction, which is called disarming weapons or dismantling weapon systems.

 

Read more:

http://ploughshares.org.nz/

See the video:

http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/1320238/1755601

A Resistance Wiki (The relaunch)

Stellan Vinthagen April 21st, 2008

Your help is needed! Resistance Studies Network is trying to collect the collective intelligence and collaboration around information, thoughts and resources on “resistance” through our own Wiki. A wiki is a collective platform for editing texts which makes everyone who has logged in able to change, add and start new texts.

The purpose of the Resistance Studies Wiki (click on the link above: “Wiki”, or directly here) is to collect views, theories and references concerning “resistance” and its different sub-headings; like e.g. Definitions of resistance, types of resistance, terrorism, revolution or collecting information on resistance novels, films, websites, etc.

You are all welcome to add to the Resistance Wiki. Please help out making it to THE resource for resistance studies.

PS: The Wiki was launched more than a year ago at the same time as this webpage went online but we had problems with so much spam that we had to close it. This time you need to create your own login in order to edit, but it is easy and you do it yourself.

Olympic Games - The next arena for global protests?

jj April 20th, 2008

In the nineties we saw an interesting move from parts of global civil society; they used the Top Level Summits to empower themselves, protest, and reach the media headlines. This year we have seen a number of actors within civil society using the opportunity of the visits of the Olympic Torch to make their voice heard. Tibet is only one of the issues we have seen on these occasions and much more is expected until and during the games begin on August 8th. While Joseph Goebbels used the 1936 Games for promoting Nazism and Black Panther made the 1968 games in Mexico worth remembering we now see huge masses of people taking to the streets with a wide range of agendas.
Torch Protest in Dharamsala
Torch Protest in Dharamsala
Tens of thousands of police and military troops to guard the “symbol of peace and cooperation” is difficult to explain without trying to understand why these people are on the streets. When the actual Games begin we can expect even more demonstrations; and probably not only in Beijing. With other words: En excellent time and arena for anyone who wants be visible in international media.

Interesting enough we have in recent days seen demonstrations from supporters of the Chinese politics protesting against the demonstrations in Paris, Buenos Aires, London, Delhi and elsewhere. These dynamics of en emerging Chinese nationalism, maybe due to protests against the regime would be a fascinating filed to research. As China grows economically and militarily and open up to the rest of the world the role of an emerging civil society within China should be followed by people interested in Resistance studies and Civil Societies.

The future Olympics Games will have several opportunities for a number of groups to take the opportunity. In 2010 the Olympic Games will take place in Canada. And already have aboriginal leaders in Canada´s First Nation started planning to disrupt the Games over poverty and land claims. Several North American Indian bands in westernmost British Columbia province are threatening bridge blockades, airport disruptions and other protests if no progress is made to curb extreme poverty in native communities and to resolve their outstanding land claims. “I wouldn’t rule out blockades, I wouldn’t rule out demonstrations,” David Dennis, vice president of the United Native Nations, told the daily Globe and Mail.

He said the protests could kick off as early as next February, one year before the start of the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver on Canada’s Pacific Coast.

“The situation here is compelling enough to convince Canadians that while it is okay and right for them to express outrage with the Chinese government’s position against Tibet and the Tibetans, they should be just as outraged, if not more so, about our situation here,” Phil Fontaine, national chief of the Assembly of First Nations, said Thursday at a press conference.

For the Olympic Games in London in 2012 we can expect protests from a number of former and present colonies. The British war on Argentine in the Falklands war, engagement in Iraq and Afghanistan etc can easily be focus for protests. Olympic Games in 2014 takes place in Sochi in Russia. With the autonomous Abkhazia as closest territory and South Ossetia who both struggles for independence from Georgia there will for sure be demonstrations and protests. Not far away is Chechnya, Dagestan, and other areas with people who want to cut their links to Moscow. The Russian empire have a long history of atrocities and the growing authoritarian tendencies with censorship and surveillance creates new conflicts regularly.

It is not a spectacular prophecy that the Olympic Games for some decades to come will be a platform for resistance. A lot of documentation and case studies to be done by researchers!

A work made by resistance-students

Zofia April 17th, 2008

subversive-cross-stitching.jpg

This photo is from the Museum of World Culture in Gothenburg, who has a cooperation with the University of Gothenburg. At the University there is a course called “Power, resistance and change”, linked to an exhibition at the museum called “Take action! 83 ways to change the world”. On the little note placed beside the students it says:

Craftivism:

Here you can see some of the students taking the course
“Power, resistance and change” here at Museion. They
started a craftivism-group after a very interesting lecture
on the subject. The group meets once a week stitching,
sewing, cross-stitching or doing other traditional craftwork.
Today they made themselves part of the exhibition.

Next »